The woman with Charlie is wearing clothes and makeup that are more in line with Gina’s appearance. There are also clues that Gina is with Charlie at the end, both visually and textually. Plus, Gina would have no reason to ask what happened to her own body. Earlier in the series, Leni is shown changing her appearance, and so it makes sense for her to be the woman in the more elaborate disguise at the bookstore. It is an art-house for art-house’s sake, with almost nothing but flirting with images and half-tones.While it's left unclear in the Echoes Netflix series ending which twin is with Charlie, she is most likely Gina, while Leni was the woman at the reading. “High life” impresses with its graphics, style, framing, and acting (Robert Pattinson once again screams with his face and body that he’s ready to start collecting Oscars), but it’s hard to take the film as a meaningful work of art. Except diluted with inexplicable experiments and studies, the essence of which neither the main characters nor, it seems, the director herself know. It is another story of what can happen to humans hundreds of light years away from civilization, in the midst of a perfect void. High life” encourages thinking on a grand scale but shows only a cramped ship locked in with either humans or isolated animals in human form. Because there are too many details, and they don’t always interact with each other. From the beginning of the movie, you absorb this visual graphomania, expecting that sooner or later the mosaic will come together – but (spoiler) it won’t. Metaphors, contradictory timelines, excessive naturalism – Denis uses every possible way to make the viewer wade through the narrative on both intellectual and empathic levels. The ending of the story leaves room for fantasy, but the emotional rapprochement between Monte and Willow gives hope that all is not yet lost for us. And the film itself is an attempt to find the fundamental truth behind simple desires and needs, animal instincts, and natural impulses. The suicidal mission of the “High life” crew is a demonstration of humanity’s seemingly meaningless journey. The majestic horror of the universal ” nothingness ” collides with problems of identity (Monte – father, Monte – lover, Monte – friend) and an overwhelming fear of physical attraction. Deebs, who is either an allegory of impartial mother nature (in one scene, she tells how she killed her own children) or a collective image of a man going into oblivion, the modest interiors of the spaceship, and the peaceful and quietly disturbing earthly landscapes are all part of the complex mosaic of the film. The gloomless darkness of interstellar space, the crew’s vague dreams of the future, the poised Monte, and the seductive Mrs. And if so, why are there instances of platonic love in life? Are they not proof of the difference between man and animal? Claire Denis provides no answers. The filmmaker ponders whether conception can be immaculate and sex a continuation of the species or whether it is a way of satisfaction and a form of love that is beautiful and spiritualized. In “High life,” the director is not interested in the physical justification of the essence of things. This does not prevent the production from becoming a coherent statement, not always consistent, but elegant, visually fascinating, and penetrating. And let the scientific rationale for the group’s mission seem far-fetched, and the choice of crew members lacks logic. The movie reveals Freudian motifs because even in spaceman is unable to curb his instincts.įilling the film with naturalistic episodes (semen, blood, sweat, breast milk, and female secretions) and contemplative ones (a serene child in the cramped cabin of a spaceship, people “floating” in space as if falling into the abyss), resorting to circumlocution, putting form above meaning, the director gives the picture a poetic quality. While looking at the man, Denis equates him with an animal. The threat to life becomes, oddly enough, an all-consuming desire. He speaks of the meaninglessness of existence and the imminent end of mankind. In one of the earthly scenes, he is voiced by an unnamed professor explaining the essence of the explorers’ journey. The story of the people who have set out into the unknown is a way of showing the erotic experience of people trapped, who have virtually lost their bearings in life, as well as providing a terrible diagnosis of humanity. READ: Meaning of the movie “Pearl Harbor” and ending explained
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |